| laoyao 的个人资料A Chinese in America日志列表 | 帮助 |
|
|
2月26日 The last strawShe must have lost her mind. She sounds exactly like Karl Rove accuses people who criticize the war as unpatriotic. And the heat is just unbelievable. She is surely more Howard Dean than Obama is Karl Rove. Bye bye, Hillary! I have to admit that I feel bad. That's not because I liked her. I never did. I just dislike Obama more. And now I have to decide whether I dislike more McCain or Obama. One interesting thing I found, from myself as well as many other voters, is that people don't vote based on reason as much as emotional instinct. This is of course no news. I myself blogged many times against it. That's why it's so provoking to me when I found (or finally admit) I am one of them. For example, I NEVER study the platform of either candidates in details, I just dislike Obama because he is rhetoric, the type of the politicians I as a Chinese despise intuitively. (Of course an excuse could be there's no much difference between Obama and Hillary that worths time investment.) I've come to one theory for that. Vote for a specific candidate is a specific meme. There are rational reasonings to support these memes, which form a memeplex. These memeplexes compete in one's brain. The fittest survives. But that's not up to which one fits the reality, or logic, or reasoning. No, it's who fits best the environment, the brain. The memeplex that makes the brain feel good survives. Some brain reward reasoning strongly, but that's very rare. Most just yield to the subconscious unknown pleasure. Yet people think they are reasoning, because they all have a decent memeplex to support their decision. And these kind of memeplex are just too many. That's why rationality often ends up only as an excuse for irrationality. 7月24日 Run Gore Run! Run Bloomberg Run! Run Jeb Run!![]() The cover story of May 28th issue of TIME was "The Last Temptation Of Al Gore", that covered the new popularity Gore has been gaining in recent years, among liberals as well as general public. It suggested that Gore was hurt far deeper than we thought in the 2000 election, and is anyway a reluctant politician, currently happy with he is doing. He always denies that he is going to run for President next year, but he never completely ruled it out either. Rumor has that he is waiting the news of Nobel Prize. He, together with Sheila Watt-Cloutier, a Canadian grassroots environmentalist, is rumored to have great chance of winning the Nobel Prize of Peace this year. The result will be disclosed in late October, ceremony in early December. If he does win, he can still make in the Iowa caucus in January with enough momentum. But will he run? We've already heard similar rumors before Oscar. OK, the Academy gave Oscar to him, but all that he did in the ceremony was making a joke about running. And then people said, he is going to release a book. He is testing water by how this politically navigated book sells. Now the book has been out for months, we still didn't hear anything from him. Of course, Nobel Prize of Peace would be a totally different animal. The laureate would be among the group of Mandela, Martin Luther King, Dalai Lama, and Mother Teresa. That would be a huge asset, not to mention the big popularity he is already enjoying now among Democratic voters. If you google "draft Gore", you will find how many people want to see him run for President in 2008. ![]() And I am one of them. But make no mistake, I am not going to vote for him (because I can't vote). I am just a little disappointed by the current crowd. Hillary, Obama, Edwards......is that what Democrats can come out with? Come on, Look at what Republicans got: Gulliani and McCain! I just hope Democrats can get someone with higher electibility. I don't expect his policy would be better than Hillary though (or worse). I just want to have more fun in the coming big election. :-) And of course, talking about who is going to jump into the pool recently, the big news is New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg quit Republican to become an Independent. He announced it on June 19th. And this is the cover story of that week's TIME that appeared in bookshelf just one day before: ![]() Coincidence? I don't think so. For people who are still speculating whether Bloomberg is gonna run, I can bet one dollar with you that he will. Or if you know some gambling website that bets on this, please let me know. But I will not bet with you that he chooses Schwarzenegger as his running mate. Steve Jobs suggested that in the TIME cover story, and also pointed out that US constitution doesn't prohibit a citizen born outside US run for vice president. I certainly think Arnold would be an awesome vice president, and surely an exciting running mate candidate. But I will not bet my money on Bloomberg thinking so too. Well, actually that doesn't matter to me who Bloomberg's running mate is. This pro-choice, pro-gay rights, pro-immigration, pro-business, anti-crime, small government, no non-sense, former Republican and former former Democratic mayor always has my support. His administration will not be ideal government I am hoping for, 'cause what I want is capitalism anarchy, but his would be surely be better than anyone from the two big parties. ![]() OK, my blog should stop here. But I feel just unfair to Republicans that I've wished a Democratic candidate and an Independent candidate to run. So which Republican candidate do I want to see run for president? Of course, Dick Cheney! Why? Because he is so cool! 'Lil Bush depicts Cheney as Darth Vader. I don't know whether Cheney is angry with that, but I am sure Darth Vader is. It is said that to succeed in Chinese politics, you have to be both Shameless and Ruthless. Surely Darth Vader is ruthless, but he is not shameless at all. That's why he was hated and killed, but Cheney was hated and prospering. What a pity he is not going to run! Then who else? Condi? surely she rocks, but probably no electibility. Ah...Finally I got it! How about Jeb?! He can instantly win the hearts of the evangelicals, gain the trust of conservatives, and most important of all, inherit from his brother the loyalty of Karl Rove, who stated publicly that "I am a Bush guy". Surely Jeb said he is not going to run. But who didn't say that? Gore said that, Bloomberg said that. And you will see...... ![]() 6月13日 Anyone reads both TIME and 南都周刊?I surely don't. But I do read TIME and surf on Chinese internet. And I happen to be very interested in the science of food. That's why I read both of these: Cover Story of 6/11 TIME: The Science of Appetite 南都周刊: 理性压倒食欲的科学 Click on these two and then you will see how similar they are. Actually if you read the paper version of that TIME issue, you will see a more obvious similarity. TIME featured a really nice picture: a young lady holding some junk food in her hand, and you can see organs in her body, with captions illustrating their functions and interactions. The 南都周刊 article's picture is similar, but doesn't make too much sense since they didn't include the captions. I was wondering why that picture was there. Now I am still wondering too, but with other reasons. Three possibilities: 1. Plagiarism 2. Authorized translation, but failed to acknowledge. 3. These two articles happen to be based on some same scientific report, written in similar style, and they both like to use that pose in pictures! I left a message on that article to see what they say. 5月6日 some Readers' Letters for the Time's China issue![]() The cover story of Jan. 22nd Time was the rise of China. There were some interesting comments from readers that appeared on the issue two weeks later. But to be fair and balanced, I quote all of them here, so that you know the world is not as crazy as I would have presented. :-) Rise of a New Superpower Our inaugural section on China examined how that country is directing its commercial growth outward, building foreign economies and its political muscle along the way. Readers grappled with how the world has yet to change China--and how China has yet to change the world RE "The Chinese Century" [Jan. 22]: I am from China, and I'm studying in a medical school in the U.S. Like many young people in China, I have a lot of worries about the country's uncertain future. Chinese society has extremely good aspects, such as a booming economy and increased opportunities for young people, but also bad sides, like Internet censorship and peasants' and laborers' poorly protected rights. China's leaders must be made to understand that democratic reforms are urgently needed. Not only is China's peaceful rise an aspiration of 1.3 billion Chinese, but it will be good for the rest of the world too. KOU QIN Augusta, Ga. TIME reported on China's business activity in Africa but was silent on the continent's economic strategy. It involves the New Partnerships for Africa's Development (NEPAD). Far from being a begging bowl, as many have misunderstood them to be, the partnerships are aimed at achieving political reform, sustainable economic growth and social justice. The China-Africa Summit that was held in China last year emphasized NEPAD as a long-term framework within which China should engage Africa. China is a critical player that Africa will work with strategically to establish fair procedures for international trade. As for colonization, the African people will ensure that it never happens again. TSHILIDZI MARWALA Cambridge, Mass. Your article overemphasized the lack of democracy in China, leading to speculation about possible global catastrophe and war. Democracy can't be imposed on a nation, however; it must evolve to take root and endure. China has come a long way from the feudal regime it was only 100 years ago, and it will reach democracy on its own terms. China's strategy to meet its demand for natural resources is entirely peaceful. Fierce competition for natural resources does not preclude international cooperation. Maybe China will align its strategies with the U.S.'s if the U.S. stops interfering in China's internal affairs and starts looking for common goals such as world peace and prosperity. CHRISTINA FENG Malvern, Pa. I am a 16-year-old high school student and despite spending most of my life in the U.S., my patriotic sentiments for my homeland, China, have never faded. I used to attribute criticism of China to envy of its burgeoning geopolitical influence, but having discovered that patriotism and rational thinking are not incompatible, I am now open to reasonable criticisms of that country. Most people don't realize that China has 55 ethnic minorities. An abrupt switch to a democratic system would probably prove disastrous. A strong central government exercising a bit of authoritarianism is probably not the worst evil for China at this point in time. China has made substantial progress in integrating capitalist reforms, which have brought immeasurable economic benefits. As the century moves along, the government will gradually relax its policies and adopt concepts like intellectual-property rights and maybe even human rights. I look forward to TIME's regular section on China. GEORGE LU Rockville, Md. "The Chinese Century" convinced me that by buying products made in China I am supporting that country's political nonintervention policies in areas like Darfur and helping perpetuate a disgusting lack of regard for the value of human life. From now on, I am going to focus on buying American-made products. JANET THURSTON Brighton, Mich. 5月4日 Jessica Lynch: The truth is always more heroic than the hype.![]() "The truth of war is not always easy to hear but it is always more heroic than the hype." True hero! 3月20日 Stephen Colbert asked me to run for PresidentAnd I replied: Oh, you know American people are not ready for an Asian President yet.
.....All right, you know what's really happened:
I went to the Colbert Report yesterday. As an audience of course. Colbert went to audience before the show started, and asked the audience whether they had any questions. He stood right before me at that time. So I raised my arm immediately and got picked. I asked: How can we draft you to run for President?
He sniffed with a typical Colbert character style: someone apparently missed some segements in my show. Or you don't know what that character says is something called satire.
And then he asked me: why don't you run?
I responded: I am not a US citizen, so I can't run.
And then I realized maybe I should say: I was not born in US, or I am not 36 (?) years old. He said: Here you go, and went on to pick the next audience.
And then I realized the real cool response should be: Oh, you know American people are not ready for an Asian President yet.
How retarded I was!
And then maybe he would have said: Are you Asian? You know I don't see race. I know you are an Asian because......who knows?
Anyway, that's already something. I talked to Colbert!
I went to the Jon Stewart show three weeks earlier. It was exactly the same format: you wait outside the studio for a long time, got in with a security screening, filled into the audience seats. A commedian came out, made some jokes, cheerleading practice, then Stewart / Colbert came out, talked to people. The show was taped in the same order as in TV, and shown in all monitors in the room simultaneously.
One funny thing I found from Stewart show was that, his correspondents actually stood before a green screen (there are three screens behind Jon's desk) which is replaced by some background scene in real tapingt ime. He and Jon talked to two different cameras, pretending talking via satellite, and it's really fun watching that. It's much more hillarious than when they edit these and play on TV.
Oh, another thing that I need to correct. I wrote in Chinese blog before that I waited about 3 months for Stewart ticket, but 5 months for Colbert report, from which I concluded that Colbert is more popular than Stewart now. But actually Colbert's taping room is smaller than Stewart's, perhaps something around 3 : 5 to 4 : 5. So, you do the math.
And now I no longer regret that I didn't get that "not ready for Asian President" line out. If I could make such an interesting response in such an almost intuitive way, then I probably would have already been another Colbert. I better feel proud that at least I got that line within 3 seconds, after one standard answer popped out of my mouth, and 2 other equally boring alternative answers popped out in mind. :-)
2月19日 Madonna should adopt former Halliburton CEO's child(A letter I wrote to Metro's opinions last year. It didn't get published)
Madonna should adopt former Halliburton CEO's child Regarding "A different kind of Madonna madness"(Oct. 26th), Grace asked: "What was wrong with an American child? Why not adopt a child from a broken home who has suffered already in our own country?" That's truly a good question. It makes me wonder "What was wrong with American democracy? Why promote democracy in other countries while the voting rate in the United States ranks 139th in the world?" Or "What was wrong with an American dam? Why spend billions reconstructing Iraq rather than New Orleans?" But when I think about it again, I realize that Grace's question is more legitimate than mine, since children are apparently more important than democracy and dam. And freedom, on which many believe America is founded, falls in between. Patriotism is defined in this very order. You must love all American children unconditionally more than any foreign child, and then defend freedom if it doesn't jeopardize any American child, and then promote democracy because that's what America represents. As for dam, which by no means can be used in a campaign ad, we can safely kick it out of a patriot's concern list. So Madonna is unpatriotic to put her freedom of choosing which child to adopt before the better being of an American child, but the Bush administration is patriotic to defend their freedom of choosing which country needs democracy, and where to construct dams. And how patriotic they are to contract an American company called Halliburton to do this job rather than outsource it to some Chinese company (who may or may not use child labor, which we don't care.)! Our government knows that children of Halliburton employees and former CEOs need more love than those in New Orleans. Haven't you heard that a daughter of a former Halliburton CEO suffers alienation from her own father's supporters because of her sexual orientation? I bet no child in New Orleans or Africa has such awful experience. Shame on Madonna, Angelina Jolie, and those who adopted orphans of Hurricane Katrina victims, for not adopting former Halliburton CEOs’suffering children! |
|
|